Re: draft-kuthan-sip-derive

"Hannes Tschofenig" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Given that only 2 out of 50 implementations had support for SIP Identity at
SIPit#23 I wonder how urgent the need for anything beyond P-Asserted-ID
actually is: 
https://www.sipit.net/SIPit23_Summary
 
Ciao
Hannes
 
PS: Btw, how is your document different from
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-sip-e164-rrc-01


________________________________

	From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Henry Sinnreich
	Sent: 25 October, 2008 20:03
	To: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; SIP IETF
	Subject: [Sip] draft-kuthan-sip-derive
	
	
	The 'Dialog Event foR Identity Verification' is meeting IMO the real
need for preventing forged "From" names and has the virtue of simplicity as
well. 
	It is analog to the email verification which is  successfully
deployed throughout the Internet at present.
	
	
http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/staging/draft-kuthan-sip-derive-00.txt
	
	Thanks, Henry
	


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.