Re: draft-kuthan-sip-derive

Thanks Dean. This was roughly where I wanted to get to in subsequent
questions... 
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
>Behalf Of ext Dean Willis
>Sent: 27 October, 2008 09:13
>To: Juha Heinanen
>Cc: [email protected]; 'SIP IETF'; 
>[email protected]; 'Henry Sinnreich'; 
>[email protected]; [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Sip] draft-kuthan-sip-derive
>
>
>On Oct 26, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>
>> Hannes Tschofenig writes:
>>
>>> Given that only 2 out of 50 implementations had support for SIP 
>>> Identity at
>>> SIPit#23 I wonder how urgent the need for anything beyond P- 
>>> Asserted-ID actually is:
>>> https://www.sipit.net/SIPit23_Summary
>>
>> pai does not help if you receive a request from anywhere on the 
>> internet.
>>
>
>But in the "real world", nobody uses this stuff on the 
>Internet, right? It's always proxy-tied, with no interdomain calls.
>
>So why are we bothering? is it that we THINK interdomain will 
>really happen with peering agreegements?
>
>--
>Dean
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
>This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
>[email protected] for questions on current sip 
>Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
>
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip