Re: New version of sip-keep draft
"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF089F59E5@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se> |
>>Perhaps. But, the whole idea is to use the keep-alive methods defined in Outbound, and Outbound says stun. > >this is yet another example of badly organized i-d structure. >keepalive mechanisms should have been defined in its own >i-d, not in stun or outbound i-d. all of these drafts should >go back to drawing board. If people want to actually define the keep-alive mechanism in the keep draft that's fine with me. BUT, I have done the draft based on the current working assumptions, where the keep-alive mechanism is defined in Outbound. Regards, Christer _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip