Re: Draft-ietf-sip-info-events-00: Other messages for Send-Infoand Recv-Info
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Christer Holmberg wrote: > Yes, maybe we need to define a feature tag, or feature tags. The > question is whether we would need a single feature tag which can list > all supported info packages, or a feature tag for each package (in which > case each info package definition would have to specify a feature tag > value). The advantage of having separate feature tags is that it gives > you much more flexibility. The decision about that depends on what kinds of selection you want to be able to make using callerprefs. (If anybody uses callerprefs to make selections.) If you make it a single feature with a list of values then it becomes impossible to select a particular Contact based on which packages it supports. Paul _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip