Re: INFO Events Replacing or Updating INFO?

+1, provided existing use for ISUP and QSIG (Ecma-355) continues to be
valid.

John 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat
> Sent: 24 October 2008 14:58
> To: Eric Burger
> Cc: SIP IETF
> Subject: Re: [Sip] INFO Events Replacing or Updating INFO?
> 
> 
> 
> Eric Burger wrote:
> 
> > [X] INFO Events should Obsolete RFC 2976
> > [ ] INFO Events should Update RFC 2796, because ____________
> > [ ] I do not care what you do
> 
> But of course the new document must carefully define backward 
> compatible 
> behavior. Its made a stab at that, and I expect it to be 
> complete before 
> approval.
> 
> 	Thanks,
> 	Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
> Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip