Re: More on SIP Identity

Hi John,

On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Elwell, John <[email protected]> wrote:
> Third, a reminder that there were thoughts expressed in Dublin that we
> should capture in a draft considerations about how a UA should handle
> received identity information. A first attempt at this is in:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-elwell-sip-identity-handling-u
> a-00.txt

Thanks for producing this draft.
Looking at results from the last SIPit [1], Section 3 (UA best
practice for handling received caller identifiers) could represent a
valuable work.

"I asked where people were taking bits from messages to display as caller-id.
There were many different kinds of answers, including
 P-Asserted-Identity if present, then From
 From display name
 username part of From uri
 P-Asserted-Identity only
 Contact uri
 Remote IP address
 P-Asserted-Identity, then Remote-Party-ID, then From
 From, then Remote-Party-ID, then P-Asserted-Identity
 Remote-Party-ID then From
 From then P-Assertid-Identity
 P-Asserted-Identity, then Reply-To, then From
 entire From URI"
Of these, using the From display name occurred most frequently,
but not much more than any of the other responses


[1] https://www.sipit.net/SIPit23_Summary

Cheers,
-- 
Victor Pascual Ávila
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip