Re: Proposal for multiple INFO bodies in an INFO
Anders Kristensen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Eric Burger wrote: ... > > I would also offer that since INFO does not change SIP state, which > means there is not even a concept of a message succeeding but the INFO > body doing something that "fails", the objection that it would be hard > for a UA to report on one body "failing" with another body "succeeding" > is a non-issue. Yes, this does mean that you cannot use INFO to tunnel > IP. See RFC 3252 for more on this. I do not see this as a problem. Not sure I follow this. If an INFO carries bodies for info packages A and B and the one for A is fine but the one for B is malformed, then is the INFO rejected or not? Thanks, Anders _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip