| Newsgroups |
gmane.ietf.sip |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
From: Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]>
I think the alarm bells go off for the UAC when it receives the 200 for
the ini-invite. It really shouldn't want to send the ACK yet, because as
far as it is concerned, it has an unanswered offer outstanding.
I don't think this is a workable solution -- it means that the logic
for handing the INVITE transaction (specifically, sending the ACK) has
to pay attention to the completion status of other transactions.
That's not a good thing to do.
Dale
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip