Comments on sparks-sip-steps-to-draft
Cullen Jennings <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It seems odd to me that a revision of 3261 would need to normatively reference SIP-T or SCTP. These seem like they should be extensions. _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip