Re: comments on draft-ietf-sip-info-events-01
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote: > To comment on the multipart body question below, my understanding of the > requirement from the previous discussion is that it does not come from > the need to send two info packages at the same time. > > Rather it comes from the need to send an info package plus some other > associated but yet to be described message body that happens to be > needed to be sent at the same time (e.g. info package containing a > Geolocation header pointing to a geolocation body in the same message). > If we could eliminate this, we could get rid of it, but I suspect we > cannot. > > Given this, the support of multiple packages comes for free, so why > eliminate it. Free? Certainly not. If, as an implementor, all I care about is INFO, and I don't have any other use case for multipart (which, as of now, are mostly niche uses and are not common), I'll now NEED to implement multipart for INFO. So, I don't have a problem saying that INFO can contain multiple bodies as any message can, but I do have a problem with the idea that the INFO framework ITSELF allows multiple packages per INFO. -Jonathan R. -- Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 111 Wood Avenue South Cisco Fellow Iselin, NJ 08830 Cisco, Voice Technology Group [email protected] http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (408) 902-3084 http://www.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip