Re: So where are we at with WGLC of draft-ietf-sip-body-handling?

Gonzalo Camarillo <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Dale,

we are in agreement here. I also agree that rephrasing the text per your 
suggestion will make it clearer and more explicit.

> These
> statements could be corrected by changing "if its processing as a
> whole is required" to "if its processing as a whole is required for
> processing the enclosing body part or message".

Therefore, I will make this change in the three sentences in the 
following revision of the draft.

Thanks,

Gonzalo


[email protected] wrote:
>    From: Gonzalo Camarillo <[email protected]>
> 
>    So, if nobody objects, I suggest we specify the following:
> 
> I agree with everything in this message, except that I think the
> followig three statements should be removed:
> 
>    o the handling of a multipart/mixed is 'required' if its processing as a
>    whole is required.
> 
>    o the handling of a multipart/alternative is 'required' if its
>    processing as a whole is required.
> 
>    o the handling of a multipart/related is 'required' if its processing as
>       a whole is required.
> 
> These statements are not quite correct when multiparts are nested
> (I'll explain below), and the correct interpretation comes from
> applying the stated rules to the multipart's parent part.  These
> statements could be corrected by changing "if its processing as a
> whole is required" to "if its processing as a whole is required for
> processing the enclosing body part or message".
> 
> An example is:
> 
> 	multipart/mixed;handling=required
> 
> 	    multipart/mixed;handling=optional
> 
> 	        multipart/mixed;handling=required
> 
> 	            text/xml
> 
> In this case, the processing of the 3rd multipart is required in order
> to process the 2nd multipart, but since the 2nd multipart is optional,
> there is no assurrance the 3rd multipart will be processed.
> 
> Dale
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
> Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
> 

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.