Re: So where are we at with WGLC of draft-ietf-sip-body-handling?

Hi Dale,

per my previous email, I will modify the text per your suggestions.

Thanks,

Gonzalo

[email protected] wrote:
>    From: Gonzalo Camarillo <[email protected]>
> 
>    yes, the current I-D specifies the latter; what has been called "global"
>    in the email threads. The idea was to be consistent with email. However,
>    I agree with the conclusions of the email discussions. That is, using
>    the "local" approach probably makes more sense in a SIP context.
> 
> I don't see that that change has been made in -04.  In particular (as
> Rockson notes) section 7.2 still gives the "global" interpretation.
> 
> (My suggested amendments of 3 Nov still stand, of course.)
> 
> Dale
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
> Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
> 

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip