Re: INFO: Case Sensitivity

I think I will abstain. I didn't realize that 3265 called for case 
sensitive comparisons. IMO it is the oddball among headers, but it is a 
good precedent here.

	Thanks,
	Paul

Eric Burger wrote:
> We had a long discussion about case sensitivity for Info Package names. 
> The current text follows RFC 3265 and avoids charset and I18N issues, by 
> mandating octet-by-octet comparison.
> 
> Some folks pointed out that RFC 3261 says that headers and header values 
> should be case insensitive.
> 
> Please vote:
> 
> 1. Keep case sensitive comparison, just like RFC 3265 mandates and 
> experience shows promotes interoperability
> 
> 2. Use case insensitive comparison, like RFC 3261 suggests
> 
> 3. Keep case sensitive comparison, and tell IANA not to register 
> multiple package names that might collide in the event someone does to 
> case insensitive comparisons (liberal in what you receive)
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
> Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip