Re: INFO Framework - to send-info or not to send-info

"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF05C0F990@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se>
Hi, 

>1. Remove Send-Info. It takes away a bunch of race conditions. The
value of having it is theoretical. We can always add 
>it in later, so we will keep the header name "Recv-Info".

Could someone explain those race conditions to me, or point to a thread
where they are described?

In SDP o/a, for example, I think the advantages of being able to better
describe also what-I-can-send capabilities would be more than
theoretical.

If we don't want to use two headers, we can of course have a single
header with direction parameters.

E.g; Info-Package: dtmf-package;sendonly, isup-package;sendrecv

I think we have historical examples on when adding restrictions,
withoout any really good reason, later causes problems.

Regards,

Christer

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.