Re: INFO Framework - to send-info or not to send-info
"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF05C0F990@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se> |
Hi, >1. Remove Send-Info. It takes away a bunch of race conditions. The value of having it is theoretical. We can always add >it in later, so we will keep the header name "Recv-Info". Could someone explain those race conditions to me, or point to a thread where they are described? In SDP o/a, for example, I think the advantages of being able to better describe also what-I-can-send capabilities would be more than theoretical. If we don't want to use two headers, we can of course have a single header with direction parameters. E.g; Info-Package: dtmf-package;sendonly, isup-package;sendrecv I think we have historical examples on when adding restrictions, withoout any really good reason, later causes problems. Regards, Christer _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip