Re: Review of draft-kuthan-sip-derive-00
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC313726C2B55@mail> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam > Roach > > I think the greatest appeal of an approach like the one in DERIVE, if it > can be made to work, is that it requires no explicit support on the > calling party's side. That's not totally accurate, methinks. It requires support for the dialog-event package on the UAC, and requires the UAC to allow some random far-end UA outside its domain that it does not know about to subscribe to it. [And it requires the path between the UAC and UAS to not contain b2bua's that change call-id or tag, of course] The set of deployed devices/paths which satisfy those requirements is not the universe, but then again it's not the null set either. ;) -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip