Re: Review of draft-kuthan-sip-derive-00
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Raphael Coeffic wrote: > I believe that the counter measure that you are proposing has already > been adressed in the draft. Concerning call forwarding, we know that > this is an issue. There are two such. The caller may have call forwarding setup --> DERIVE test will fail. There is not much we can do about that. The other is callee may have call forwarding setup and may wonder if To in INVITE can be used for DERIVE test even though he is not registered under it. If he is consent with using it (which he should be able to), the caller will receive a legitimate DERIVE test. So what I really think may fail here is inconsistent rewriting From/to by middleboxes. -jiri _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip