Re: Review of draft-kuthan-sip-derive-00

Cullen Jennings <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Nov 20, 2008, at 11:11 , Adam Roach wrote:

>>
>> That's not totally accurate, methinks.  It requires support for the  
>> dialog-event package on the UAC,
>
> We've established that -- "28% and likely to increase" is a good  
> starting point.
>
>> and requires the UAC to allow some random far-end UA outside its  
>> domain that it does not know about to subscribe to it.
>
> This isn't some random far-end UA that the calling party has no  
> reason to trust -- the dialog event package explicitly talks about  
> authentication based on knowledge of the dialog identifiers.

Would be really interesting to see how the deployed border security  
devices allowed or disallowed subscribes to the dialog-event.

Cullen <in my individual contributor role>



_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.