Re: INFO Framework: Tags

Bob Penfield <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC313744C0DCC@mail>
I agree with John. There is no compeling reason to include an option tag. An info-package that actually needs an option tag would need to be defined in a standards track document.

Keep it simple.

Less is more.

cheers,
(-:bob

________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Elwell, John [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 8:20 AM
To: Christer Holmberg; DRAGE, Keith (Keith); Dean Willis; Paul Kyzivat
Cc: SIP List
Subject: Re: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags

Christer,

OK, it might be simple, but still unnecessary, so why do it. I haven't
heard a compelling argument in its favour. Per-package option tags are
far more compelling (depending on particular needs of a package),
although I agree such packages would need a standards track document.

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 21 November 2008 12:16
> To: Elwell, John; DRAGE, Keith (Keith); Dean Willis; Paul Kyzivat
> Cc: SIP List
> Subject: RE: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags
>
>
> John,
>
> What is "un-simple" by defining an option tag value??? We
> have done that
> many times before...
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elwell, John [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 6:46 AM
> To: Christer Holmberg; DRAGE, Keith (Keith); Dean Willis; Paul Kyzivat
> Cc: SIP List
> Subject: RE: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags
>
> Christer,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: 20 November 2008 22:53
> > To: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); Dean Willis; Paul Kyzivat
> > Cc: SIP List; Elwell, John
> > Subject: RE: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I still think we shall have an option tag for the extension itself.
> >
> > Eventhough it does not gurantee that the UAS supports specific info
> > packages, at least you can use it to help finding a UAS
> which supports
>
> > the extensions (by using the sip.extensions feature tag).
> [JRE] I haven't heard a compelling argument for this. Keep it simple.
>
> >
> > And, as Dean said, it can be used with OPTIONS.
> [JRE] And I haven't heard a compelling argument for this. Keep it
> simple.
>
> John
>
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.