Re: INFO Framework: Tags
Dean Willis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Nov 21, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote: > > I agree with John too. I don't see the benefit. It would be > beneficial to have one for a specific package, for example dtmf, > maybe, but not the mechanism. It's like having an option tag to > support the Allow/Accept/Supported headers, as opposed to their > values. This draft is basically just a negotiation mechanism and > defining how to handle things - not the things themselves. > > We'll still have the method name "INFO" for the Allow header, if you > want to say you can't do INFO requests. If you need to do some generic non-standards track info-package, how do you quickly weed out all the old phones that don't do info-packages at all? -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip