Re: INFO Framework: Tags

Bob Penfield <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC313741541B2@mail>
This is a corner case. If you require info-packages to make a call work, it sounds to me that whatever you are sending in the info is not appropriate for info and ought to be separate stream described in the SDP.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dean Willis
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 2:51 PM
To: Hadriel Kaplan
Cc: SIP List
Subject: Re: [Sip] INFO Framework: Tags


On Nov 21, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
>
> All we have to do for vendor-proprietary users of INFO is make sure
> they interoperate with those of us who don't have them, by letting
> them discover we don't support them. (which is what recv-info does)
> We don't need to work to give them more features.
>

But the caller can't get to the recv-info until it  does an INVITE. I
don't want to be getting INVITES for calls that are going to have to
be dropped because I don't do info-packages at all. . .

--
Dean


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.