Re: sip-199-02: should it really be *199*?
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Normally when we define new response codes, don't we just let IANA assign the next one when the document is finalized? Is this one really so special that it *needs* the last provisional code? Any reason this shouldn't be 18x? (x=4 unless thats been taken by something in the pipe. 183 is the last one IANA shows.) Thanks, Paul _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip