Re: sip-199-02: should it really be *199*?

Hi, 

>Normally when we define new response codes, don't we just let IANA
assign the next one when the document is finalized? Is this one really
so special that it *needs* the last provisional code? Any reason
>this shouldn't be 18x? (x=4 unless thats been taken by something in the
pipe. 183 is the last one IANA shows.)

Due to the nature of the response code, I think it IS special. So,
therefor I think we should go for 199 (or, maybe 101, if that for some
reason is better).

Regards,

Christer

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip