Call For Consensus on INFO Tags

I let the dialog run for some 57 messages, hoping to see some  
convergence.

What I am hearing is the vast majority of people feel that the  
presence of a Recv-Info in an INVITE, 200 OK, or OPTIONS is sufficient  
to signal the UA supports the new Info Framework.  There are a few  
hold-outs - speak now with strong use cases for a generic Option Tag  
or hold your piece.

I am also hearing that it would be useful to give guidance to Info  
Package authors for when they may wish to define a Require tag for  
their package, a'la MSCML.  Again, this would be guidance, not a  
normative structure, as Option Tags already have a pretty nice  
definition.

Am I missing anything else?

Thanks.

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip