Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO

"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF05C0F9EE@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se>
Fine, assume we go for one package only: in the case of multipart, how
do I find the package? 

You have started a separate thread on that, so maybe we can move this
discussion there.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hadriel Kaplan [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 11:58 PM
To: Christer Holmberg; Eric Burger
Cc: SIP List
Subject: RE: [Sip] INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 2:38 PM
>
> >From a protocol perspective: you'd have to define that more than one
> package name can be indicated in an INFO,
>
> Sure. You allow a list of values in the Info-Package header.

I'm not a developer, but ISTM that alone means more code complexity and
test cases than a single one, and certainly more than current INFO usage
in the wild.


> Trust me, I want all this to be simple, but I also want to be able to 
> answer when someone asks be why it is not allowed :)

That's easy: "To keep it simple".

-hadriel
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.