Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF05C0F9EE@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se> |
Fine, assume we go for one package only: in the case of multipart, how do I find the package? You have started a separate thread on that, so maybe we can move this discussion there. -----Original Message----- From: Hadriel Kaplan [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 11:58 PM To: Christer Holmberg; Eric Burger Cc: SIP List Subject: RE: [Sip] INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO > -----Original Message----- > From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 2:38 PM > > >From a protocol perspective: you'd have to define that more than one > package name can be indicated in an INFO, > > Sure. You allow a list of values in the Info-Package header. I'm not a developer, but ISTM that alone means more code complexity and test cases than a single one, and certainly more than current INFO usage in the wild. > Trust me, I want all this to be simple, but I also want to be able to > answer when someone asks be why it is not allowed :) That's easy: "To keep it simple". -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip