Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I think it defining valid syntax without carefully defining the corresponding semantics that is the problem. As long as we define both I don't see it as a problem. Thanks, Paul Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > El Viernes, 28 de Noviembre de 2008, Christer Holmberg escribió: >> If there is no technical reason I don't see why we again shall make a >> restriction which we later may "suffer" from. > > I think the whole SIP protocol is a good example of how a too much permissive > design creates more interop issues than a more restricted design. > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip