Re: Multiple body-parts in one INFO

Eric Burger <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Don't forget, a Content-ID is a TOKEN, not a URI.  One may use a URI,  
because a URI is a token.

Does anyone read the draft before they comment?  Folks have been  
saying, "What would an INFO with multiple body parts look like?"
READ PAGES 31-32!!!

The example there uses a Content-ID of abcd9999qq and abcd1234zz.   
Does not look like a URI to me...

On Nov 30, 2008, at 12:28 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:

>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 7:12 AM
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is what I was afraid of...
>>
>> I think that having to use URIs in order to recognize the info  
>> package
>> is anything but simple...
>
> Agreed.  But I don't think we need to.  Legacy INFO is already  
> deployed.  Subscribe/Notify is already deployed.  UPDATE is already  
> deployed. MESSAGE is already deployed.  None of them use a CID for  
> the body part that is germane to their method's context, AFAIK.  It  
> is up to the piggy-backer uses that want to add other body-parts to  
> use CID for their parts.  For example, if you wanted to add a body  
> part for geo-loc to a Notify message that was sent for a presence  
> package, the Geolocation header would contain a CID, not the Event  
> header.
>
> This "problem" already exists for current SIP messages, and it's up  
> to the new extensions that add body-parts to solve it in a backward- 
> compatible way for all message methods.  We don't need to solve it  
> specifically for INFO.
>
> -hadriel
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
> Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature, 2.6 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.