Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-00.txt
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC313776E2308@mail> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Lawrence [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 2:33 PM > > I don't think that reformulating call-id is any harder to deploy than a > new header would be. You missed an email explaining that: if we mandate not changing "safe" call-id values, all b2bua's along the path have to stop changing it, and the UAC has to create a "safe" one. If we do a new header, only some b2bua's need to change for matching to work in most cases. All of them would need to pass the header for it to work, but my assumption is that's more likely. It may be a false assumption, but from the traces I get to see, it looks like new headers get through fairly often. (at least those without URI's) -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip