Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC3137A7E3961@mail> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 1:36 PM > > - *some* error code that can be returned as the response to INFO, > which indicates: I didn't like the *content* of the package. > If we have a single response that can be used for that, then Is there some reason you need a different response code than 415 or 400? Do you think the UAC can take some different automated action due to getting back a 488-type response than a 400, for example? [I personally hate new response codes - middleboxes always seems to be asked to map them to a different number.] > I expect that Reason can be used to refine it. Unless this has changed, I thought the Reason header was only allowed in requests? (even though I know people put it in responses, and honestly it was silly to only apply it to requests to begin with) -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip