Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Dean Willis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote: > INFO must carry a response. Putting application-level data into an INFO response is problematic as this may make the INFO body larger than the transport package size, and we have no way to reject large responses. This is exactly why we stalemated on diagnostic responses. Given the characteristics of SIP-as-transport, the only reasonable thing to do (beside change SIP) is to require all application-layer responses use SIP requests in the return direction onstead of piggybacking on the SIP response. The SIP response can, in general, tells us only about the handling of the request's delivery at a SIP level, not an application level. -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip