Sip-199: security impacts (maj-4)

"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF05C0FA02@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se>
Hi,

We still need text for the security section in the 199 draft.

Robert said the following in his comments on the draft:

"There's a lot to talk through here. For instance, I can spoof 199s to
affect how a call is ultimately answered in ways that are different
(from the endpoints visibility into what happened point-of-view) from
cancels/byes or even other response manipulation."

As Robert says, calls can already be affected by spoofing responses
and/or CANCEL/BYE requests, so I guess the text we are looking for is
the "different ways" of spoofing that 199 could be used for.

If a spoofed 199 is sent to a UAC, the UAC will (assuming it supports
199) terminate that specific dialog. If a spoofed non-200 final response
is sent to a UAC, it will terminate the whole session setup. So, I guess
someone could use 199 to terminate a dialog which would be used to
provide the UAC with some important information, but the call setup
would still continue. However, the same thing could be achieved by
spoofing a BYE towards the UAC on the same dialog (eventhough I think
many terminals would terminte the whole session setup in that case...).

Feel free to do some brainstorming :)

Regards,

Christer

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.