Re: draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-00.txt
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC3137B9DCA2B@mail> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul > Kyzivat > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 1:30 PM > > If a B2BUA (B) is doing 3pcc: > > |------ C > | > A ------ B > | > |------ D > > and it first connects A to C, and later transfers the call to D, will A > and C and D all have the same Session-Id? Yes, under the current model it would. It's not a necessary scenario to have the same Session-ID, IMO, but it's covered that way. (but clearly the remote-tag would not match if D sent a Subscribe to A) > Then take same picture, but make B be a conference focus, to which A, C > and D are all connected. Will they ever have the same Session-Id? As currently defined no, it would not. I talked to some people about that at the IETF meeting, and they thought that was the right thing to do, as do I; but we couldn't define a textual explanation of what properties made that right. > Also, how are dialog event packages supposed to work? Is it expected > that they will be extended to contain Session-Ids? Yes. As an optional XML element update to them, which only gets used for matching if the call-id element did not match. -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip