Re: Resubmitted INVITE request for 421 and 420
"BONNAERENS Ben" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <8144761F31F48D43AD53D09F5350E38003BD2B84@FRVELSMBS22.ad2.ad.alcatel.com> |
Hi, RFC3261 8.1.3.5 is pretty clear: " In all of the above cases, the request is retried by creating a new request with the appropriate modifications. This new request constitutes a new transaction and SHOULD have the same value of the Call-ID, To, and From of the previous request, but the CSeq should contain a new sequence number that is one higher than the previous." Best regards, Ben. Ps: Ask questions about the existing protocol at the sip-implementors list ________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Vavilapalli Srikanth-A19563 Sent: donderdag 4 december 2008 10:36 To: [email protected] Subject: [Sip] Resubmitted INVITE request for 421 and 420 Hi I have a doubt related to resubmitting of the INVITE request for 421/420. Can any one please clarify me? While re-submitting a INVITE request upon receiving a 421 Extension Required/420 Bad Extension, Are there any recommendation of using the same Call-Id/From tag of original INVITE request in the resubmitted request? If so, is there any reason/use-case for such recommendation? Regards Srikanth _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip