Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF083CD067@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se> |
Hi, >>IF we would end up using CID, I still don't see the problem. There >>would be a direct "link" between a Info-Package value and a body part >>(assuming there is an associated body part). >> >>If we are NOT going to use CID (or any other mechanism which creates >>the same link) I am ok with one-per-INFO. > >And that's why we're still discussing it. That is not true. The do-we-need-a-linkage question also apply to multipart in genral, e.g. where you do have only one info package body part, in addition to some other body parts. Regards, Christer _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip