Re: draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-00.txt
"Dale Worley" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Organization | Nortel Networks |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 23:43 -0500, Hadriel Kaplan wrote: > >> > >> |------ C > >> | > >> A ------ B > >> | > >> |------ D > >> > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 3:49 PM > > > > You mentioned something like "dialog-set". I'm not certain yet if "set" > > is the proper term here. But assume for the moment that it is. > > > > Then what you really have is a "dialog-set-id" right? Not a session-id. > > I think very few people on this planet know what a SIP "dialog" is. :) It's one of the few unambiguously defined things in SIP... > But the word "Session" is a more common word for operators (even > though its definition in SIP is far more ambiguous, IMO). > > For example, I think in your first 3PCC example (up top) most people > really do expect that the same Session-ID be used for A-to-C. Whether > it should be the same for B-D is what (IMO) is fine but not necessary, > but that's just my opinion; and I bet plenty of operators would > consider that the same "Session" too and be surprised if it wasn't. "the same Session-ID to be used for A-to-C" ... as is used for *what*? Do you mean, "the same session-id to be used for the A-to-B and B-to-C dialogs of the A-to-C session"? Dale _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip