Re: Identity Survey
"Victor Pascual Ávila" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.sip-implementors |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:20 AM, Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm just wondering if folks could share with me, privately or publicly, > if they have implemented Identity RFC4474, what worked for them or not, > and in what extent it is being actually deployed. I've seen no responses so far. Quoting from [1]: "There were only 2 implementations claiming support for Identity"-- one of them was [2], which is currently used in our SIP service. One of the issues we encountered was that of message integrity: it only works if the signing proxy is the same as the SDP-changing (we calculate it above SIP message as sent out, not as received). [1] The summary for SIPit23: https://www.sipit.net/SIPit23_Summary [2] SER module which implements Enhancements for Authenticated Identity Management (RFC4474) http://www.iptel.org/auth_identity_0 http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ser/sip_router/modules/auth_identity/ Cheers, -- Victor Pascual Ávila _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip