Re: scope of derive
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dean Willis wrote: > > On Dec 8, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Jiri Kuthan wrote: > >> Elwell, John wrote: >>> [JRE] The number of negatives will diminish, true, but it will never >>> approach zero, because there will always be negative cases arising from >>> forking, call forwarding, problematic B2BUAs, etc.. >> >> indeed. >> >>> So it is a question >>> whether it will get sufficiently close to zero that the odd false >>> negative can safely be ignored. I am rather doubtful. >> >> The question remains: why would like to worry about the negative case >> when we know it has zero information value?? I cannot conceive anyone >> would like to use such non-information and I don't see the point in >> studying it then. > > How would DERIVE change the behavior of the user in the positive case? That's a policy thing. Perhaps (as an example) increase a call atempt score beyond a threshold that will prevent the call from falling in voicemail. > How would DERIVE change the behavior of the user in the negative case? not at all. -jiri > > -- > Dean > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip