Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Dean Willis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Dec 9, 2008, at 5:56 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > > This seems to make it *incorrect* to return any error response in > the case where the content of the body is incorrect. (For instance > if the syntax of the body part is inconsistent with the Content-Type > declared for that part. > If the syntax is correct enough for the MIME layer t decode the object, SIP is happy. For example, let;s say it is an image/jpeg of your girlfriend. If the SIP Stack can unpack the image/jpeg from the MIME, SIP is happy. If it turns out to be a bad picture of your girlfriend and makes her look like the clown from "It", that's not SIP's problem. If it's actually an image/gif with an erroneous image/jpeg tag on it, that's also not SIP's problem. > While I am ok with *allowing* the UAS to return a 200 in this case, > I think we go too far to say they UAS MUST NOT return an error for > this situation. I'm thinking this should be normative, actually. If it's an error that SIP can't detect, reporting it as a SIP error seems bogus. If we have to have application-driven errors, we probably need a new response code. -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip