Re: ACK not matching

"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF09BFA293@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se>
Hi,
 
No, user=phone should not be added. Only the To tag for the dialog,
which you get in responses, should be added to the ACK (and all other
in-dialog requests).
 
Regards,
 
Christer


________________________________

	From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of [email protected]
	Sent: 10. joulukuuta 2008 13:10
	To: [email protected]
	Subject: [Sip] ACK not matching
	
	

	Hi,

	 

	Is it correct to have "user=phone" added only in ACK's To header
while it is missing in initial INVITE, even though both the messages use
Tel-URI.

	 

	Please refer to the trace below:

	 

	Request-Line: INVITE sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0

	    Message Header

	        Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
X.X.X.X:5060;branch=z9hG4bKf0m63e30306gvdocj180.1

	        To: <sip:[email protected];transport=UDP>

	        From: <sip:[email protected];user=phone>;tag=t570lgsc

	        Call-ID: 10.6.0.13450701228437693202

	        CSeq: 2 INVITE

	        Max-Forwards: 66

	        Content-Length: 211

	        Contact: <sip:[email protected]:5060;transport=udp>

	        Content-Type: application/sdp

	        Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, OPTIONS, PRACK

	        Accept: application/sdp

	        

	    Status-Line: SIP/2.0 100 Trying

	    Message Header

	        Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
X.X.X.X:5060;branch=z9hG4bKf0m63e30306gvdocj180.1

	        f:<sip:[email protected];user=phone>;tag=t570lgsc

	        t:<sip:[email protected];transport=UDP>

	        i:10.6.0.13450701228437693202

	        CSeq:2 INVITE

	        l:0

	 

	    Status-Line: SIP/2.0 180 Ringing

	    Message Header

	        Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
X.X.X.X:5060;branch=z9hG4bKf0m63e30306gvdocj180.1

	        f:<sip:[email protected];user=phone>;tag=t570lgsc

	
t:<sip:[email protected];transport=UDP>;tag=000000009EC7356300000
00000

	        i:10.6.0.13450701228437693202

	        CSeq:2 INVITE

	        l:0

	 

	    Status-Line: SIP/2.0 200 OK

	    Message Header

	        Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
X.X.X.X:5060;branch=z9hG4bKf0m63e30306gvdocj180.1

	        f:<sip:[email protected];user=phone>;tag=t570lgsc

	
t:<sip:[email protected];transport=UDP>;tag=000000009EC7356300000
00000

	        i:10.6.0.13450701228437693202

	        CSeq:2 INVITE

	        c:application/sdp

	        m:<sip:172.20.192.109:5060>

	        l:203

	    

	    Request-Line: ACK sip:172.20.192.109:5060 SIP/2.0

	    Message Header

	        Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
X.X.X.X:5060;branch=z9hG4bKf0m63e30306gvdocj180.1

	        To:
<sip:[email protected];transport=UDP;user=phone>;tag=000000009EC7
35630000000000

	        From: <sip:[email protected];user=phone>;tag=t570lgsc

	        Call-ID: 10.6.0.13450701228437693202

	        CSeq: 2 ACK

	        Max-Forwards: 68

	        Content-Length: 0

	 

	 

	Regards,

	Sunil

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.