Re: scope of derive
Dean Willis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Dec 10, 2008, at 6:48 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote: >> > > Jiri, I would like to make sure I understand exactly what is broken > here. So, say some B2BUA that implements 4474, like SER is running > at iptel.org. And I have an account, say [email protected]. Now my > phone is registered and sends an INVITE to SER with the From set to "[email protected] > ". My understanding is SER edits the SDP then does the 4474 > signature and sends it on. > > So in the case you are discussing here, what exactly is broken that > stops iptel.org from both editing SDP and doing 4474? > I'm not Jiȓi, but: The INVITE hits the SER proxy at the terminating domain, say FWD, which then rewrites the SDP and sends it on. The originating signature is now broken. Or the FWD proxy rewrites the signature, and the cert doesn't match the domain. Broken. -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip