Re: scope of derive
Dean Willis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Dec 11, 2008, at 2:46 PM, Elwell, John wrote: >> > [JRE] I am not sure you need RFC 4474 end-to-end - you just need > something end-to-end that binds the fingerprint of the DTLS-SRTP > certificate to a substantial part of the SIP message, but that need > not > include the entire SDP. I don't disagree about what we MIGHT need, but what we DO need, given what we wrote into the dtls-srtp spec, is RFC 4474 all the way to the UAS. All of these go together in explaining why we have no deployments of RFC 4474 and no deployments of DTLS-SRTP worth mentioning. Apparently, people prefer public discourse with anonymous/unidentified parties. Given what I hear about college sex lives these days, I shouldn't be surprised. -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip