Re: Question regarding conflicting grammar for IPV6 SIP URI andRFC 3986

"Brett Tate" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <BBE61D1553D8A34F812FF87377B2935F062D9AE8@ATL1VEXC020.usdom003.tco.tc>
> To fit a sip uri within 3986 I think you must start with:
>
> URI = scheme ":" hier-part [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ]
>
> hier-part     = path-rootless
>
> path-rootless = segment-nz *( "/" segment )
>
> segment-nz    = 1*pchar
>
> pchar = unreserved / pct-encoded / sub-delims / ":" / "@"
>
> unreserved = ALPHA / DIGIT / "-" / "." / "_" / "~"
>
> Not only does the above exclude the IPv6 syntax, 
> it also excludes lots of other things that are 
> commonly used in the userinfo portion of sip URIs.

Like what?  The following is the sub-delims expansion:

sub-delims = "!" / "$" / "&" / "'" / "(" / ")" / "*" / "+" / "," / ";" /
"="

<snip>


> Don't mailto URIs have similar problems? 
> What are they doing about it?

I assume sip is not the only URI with the issue; however I haven't
checked.  

Here is the IANA list: http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes.html
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.