Re: Summary (Was: [Re: Question regarding conflicting grammar for IPV6 SIP URI andRFC 3986])
Dean Willis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Dec 19, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > > > Presumably we (i.e., the SIP WG) can provide a statement > on why we think that rfc3986 should be changed, and how it > can be changed, but here is a (hopefully small) list of > potential questions and side-effects we don't have an answer > to. > > Then have someone in the right authority arbitrate the ABNF > fix. > Personally, I think the URI/v6 problem has a very large scope. I'd be tempted to raise the question on the IETF general list and ask where the work should go. -- Dean _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip