BCP or Informational: Mechanisms for UA initiated privacy

Shida Schubert <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <[email protected]>
  At the last meeting, Keith asked the group to provide feedback on
whether the draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy addressing the milestone
"Mechanisms for UA initiated privacy" should proceed as BCP or
as an informational.

  As a co-author of the draft, my inclination is to go informational.

  Reason is because the 2 specifications the draft requires, namely
GRUU and TURN aren't widely deployed, and neither are RFCs
(Although GRUU I believe is pretty close.).

  Despite the fact that people I talked to are keen on implementing
these specifications, I don't think the draft which requires and
depends on specifications that aren't widely deployed neither RFC
should be proceeded as a Best Current Practice..

  Regards
   Shida

  
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.