Re: BCP or Informational: Mechanisms for UA initiated privacy

I agree.

John 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shida Schubert [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: 07 January 2009 10:43
> To: [email protected] List
> Cc: Elwell, John; Drage, Keith (Keith)
> Subject: BCP or Informational: Mechanisms for UA initiated privacy
> 
> 
>   At the last meeting, Keith asked the group to provide feedback on
> whether the draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy addressing the milestone
> "Mechanisms for UA initiated privacy" should proceed as BCP or
> as an informational.
> 
>   As a co-author of the draft, my inclination is to go informational.
> 
>   Reason is because the 2 specifications the draft requires, namely
> GRUU and TURN aren't widely deployed, and neither are RFCs
> (Although GRUU I believe is pretty close.).
> 
>   Despite the fact that people I talked to are keen on implementing
> these specifications, I don't think the draft which requires and
> depends on specifications that aren't widely deployed neither RFC
> should be proceeded as a Best Current Practice..
> 
>   Regards
>    Shida
> 
>   
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip