Re: Conclusion of WGLC on draft-ietf-sip-subnot-etags-03

I agree with Aki

following the mail discussion, I understood that there weren't any other 
issues pending
and the document was ready for a shepherd write-up and sent to publication.

is it just a matter of polishing up or there is also some fresh issue ?

if it is just a matter of polishing, it should be better that Aki will 
do it so
we don't get derailed


/Sal


Aki Niemi wrote:
> pe, 2009-01-16 kello 12:18 -0600, ext Dean Willis kirjoitti:
>   
>>> I am wandering what happened to this draft,
>>> almost one year ago the draft was ready to progress to be published,  
>>> but it didn't
>>> and the draft expired in July!
>>> Now what is it necessary to do to let this draft progress and  
>>> finally become an RFC ?
>>>
>>>       
>> The author lost motivation.
>>     
>
> Huh? Admittedly not an entirely incorrect description of the current
> author's status, however, I was under the impression that we were
> waiting for document shepherd write-up:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg24819.html
>
> At least I've not seen nor heard of any fresh issues on this draft that
> would need my attention. 
>
> I may not have the cycles to get deeply involved in the WG discussions
> at the moment, but I have enough time to work this draft past the finish
> line.
>
> Cheers,
> Aki
>
>   

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip