Re: SIP de-REGISTER: Expires header vs expires parameteri Contact

"Francois Audet" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Message-ID <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF1BF07428@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com>
I think if you have both, the one in the contact takes precedence.

That allows you to have X+1 contacts, where X use the same 
expiry, and the other uses a per-contact expiry.

That would be my take. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Worley, Dale (BL60:9D30)
> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 08:19
> To: Gert Olsson
> Cc: [email protected]; Neelakantan Balasubramanian
> Subject: Re: [Sip] SIP de-REGISTER: Expires header vs expires 
> parameteri Contact
> 
> On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 12:48 +0100, Gert Olsson wrote:
> > Well, actually I was hoping for a 'yes' or 'no' on the question:
> > "is it FORBIDDEN to have both ?"
> 
> You may have both.
> 
> Dale
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use 
> [email protected] for questions on current sip 
> Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
> 
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.