Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie-00

"Dale Worley" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip
Organization Nortel Networks
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 23:34 +0000, Theo Zourzouvillys wrote:
> > More importantly, such a value-less parameter does nothing
> > useful:  If the client will accept requests without cookies, a request
> > without the parameter will be accepted.  If the client will not accept
> > requests without cookies, a request without the parameter will elicit a
> > 4XX response, which can be used to resend the request.
> 
> A server could behave differently when it receives a request without a
> cookie in it, for example require authentication, redirect the user
> statelessly to another transport, or something we've not thought of
> just yet :-)

"A server may choose to apply additional security mechanisms to a
request without a cookie parameter."

> It's also useful for diagnostic purposes for deployment: how will we
> know when adoption is so widespread it would be safe to require
> support for it for a request to proceed?

Good point.

It would help if you added these points to the draft.

Dale


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.