Re: draft-zourzouvillys-sip-via-cookie

Michael Procter wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> Adam Roach wrote:
>   
>> Ah -- "statelessly" means something very different to you than it does
>> to me. I think you need to explicitly call out that you're proposing a
>> modification to the basic INVITE transaction model defined in RFC 3261
>> for this new response.
>>
>> This, combined with prohibiting provisional responses, would seem to
>> have the desired effect.
>>     
>
> I don't think there is any proposed modification.  The response should
> be sent according to the rules of RFC 3261 section 8.2.7.

Wow -- I had completely forgotten about 8.2.7.

>   Amongst other
> things, this specifically prohibits provisional responses.
>
> I think the draft should explicitly mention this section.
>   


Yes, that would be a significant improvement. I think you'll also want 
to give the cookie the same properties as 8.2.7 describes for to-tags.

/a
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip