Re: Tel URI query
Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip-implementors,gmane.ietf.sip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
2009/3/2 harbhanu <[email protected]>: > I actually wanted to use +3314529!****! as example. > But then as per your interpretation too it's not allowed. Sure it's not allowed per RFC 3966 BNF syntax rules. > TISPAN 182 025: [Section 6.1.2 Identification] > The wildcarded public user identity consists of a delimited > regular expression located in the telephone-subscriber portion of a tel URI > (e.g. tel: +3314529!****!) or in the user portion of a SIP URI (e.g. > sip:*@example.com). This is annoying. It means that this specification violates the grammar specified in RFC 3966. Theorically RFC 3966 is just updated by RFC 5341. Sincerelly I can't understand how the above spec can requiere such aberration in Tel URI. > So do we have any parallel draft in IETF to apply these modification to Tel > Uri ?? > How are we supposed to handle scenarios like this ? Sorry, no idea, this is really confusing. Do people writting specifications really want TEL URI to be usable?? -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors