Re: New version (-05) of the 199 draft - ready for WGLC?

Dean Willis wrote:
> We didn't get any real answers due to a bit of confusion between this 
> and keepalive. So, let's ask the question again.
> 
> Is 199 ready for WGLC?

Yes; it is well written (I had looked at a much earlier version
and just re-read -06.)

One question for Christer:

- Does 199 carry a message/sipfrag MIME type that conveys the
  nature of the final non-2xx response?  This may have been
  discussed in the past, and if so, please let me know.  I
  do note that rfc3420 is specified in the draft as a normative
  reference, but it is not referred to anywhere in the body
  of the draft.

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip